On Robots and Baristas

Coming Impact of Automation on Pecantown

As many as two-thirds of the occupations in Guadalupe County are at-risk for some level of automation, according to a new report by the Brookings Institution.

A little more than 200 years ago, a band of textile workers in Britain took hammers and torches to the knitting machines that threatened to displace them. They called themselves Luddites, after their fictitious leader, Ned Ludd. As the Industrial Revolution exploded around them, these highly-skilled craftsmen saw their livelihoods threatened by new-fangled machines capable of increasing productivity at a pace no human alone could match.

Since then, economists have observed that the introduction of such new technology, while eliminating some jobs – created other new jobs. Someone had to make the new-fangled looms, after all. And as productivity increased, pay increased. Economists of all stripes have agreed that these new jobs and higher wages lead to demand for new things (Build-a-Bear, anyone?), new services (pedicures for all!), and new opportunities (B2B loom salesmen). We’ve certainly seen this in our area over the last few generations: fewer farmers, but more jobs at Alamo Group and Caterpillar. Microsoft Word and Quickbooks replaced typists and bookkeepers, but software engineers and IT workers took their place.

For two centuries, economists had good, empirical reasons to believe that labor-saving technologies would have no overall impact on labor and wages, despite how bad it felt to be the guy who had to abandon his craft and learn to build a knitting machine instead. But now, at the dawn of the age of the robots, economists are questioning the long-held theory that we’re all going to be just fine. It turns out that a whole swath of people in the middle are doing worse, not better.

The emerging narrative is a tale of two worlds. College-educated workers in high-skill, non-routine positions are at least risk. However, the days of landing a job at the same manufacturing plant where your parents worked straight out of high school, with a lifetime of living wages, healthcare and a pension, are numbered. Non-college educated workers in jobs like manufacturing, production, transportation and warehousing are likely to see their jobs partially or fully automated. Without specialized training and/or a college degree, these workers will be flushed into low-wage jobs, like food service, home health, or Amazon distribution centers (in the case of Amazon distribution centers, these jobs will last only until the robots get more dexterous).

This trend is already evident. David Autor, professor of economics at MIT, has tracked what he calls the polarization of work over the last 50 years. He documents rising opportunities in high-skill jobs (professional, technical and managerial) for college educated workers. But mid-skill, mid-wage jobs previously held by those without college degrees (like those in manufacturing and production, office/clerical work or sales) have been disappearing. Instead, those same laborers are being forced into lower-skill, low-paying jobs (personal services like cleaning, security, health aides). This trend will intensify as automation increases.

So, while the quantity of jobs in our community may increase, the quality of those jobs – in terms of real contribution to an individual’s quality of life and economic impact to the community – will change dramatically for some. Importantly, the effects of automation will not be felt equally by all. Non-college educated men, young workers and underrepresented groups — especially Hispanic males – are most at risk.

What does all this mean for Seguin and Guadalupe County? According to a recently-released Brookings Institution study, 50 to 64 percent of current workplace activities in Guadalupe County have exposure to automation by the year 2030. Given that Seguin boasts more manufacturing jobs per capita than any city in Texas, these trends should be cause for alarm. Of even greater concern is that only 16 percent of Seguin residents and 26 percent of Guadalupe County residents ages 25-plus have a Bachelor’s degree or higher – placing a bull’s eye directly over our community.

Fortunately, Seguin and Guadalupe County enjoy considerable resources and opportunity that enable us to prepare and respond. Next week’s post will explore Pecantown’s potential to activate regional leaders and key stakeholders to develop a shared vision and strategic plan to carry us through the coming change. At minimum, our Community Plan should address the following:

  1. Future-proof our economy through diversification
  2. Stress lifelong-learning, educational attainment and certification programs
  3. Support digital skills training and re-training
  4. Advance quality of life initiatives that attract positive growth
  5. Encourage development of uniquely human skills: interpersonal, creative, critical thinking

There’s a freight train coming our way. We can barricade ourselves in, or we can lay new track and turn a threat into an opportunity. Let’s start thinking about ways our city, county, educational and business leaders can do more together than apart.

Big Idea Takeaway: Employers like Dell and Accenture offer higher-wage, future-proof jobs. Let’s explore community and school-based certification and digital badging programs that create direct pipelines to such employers for students and adult learners – right here in Seguin.

5 Replies to “On Robots and Baristas

  1. Well said! I believe that a comprehensive, multi-layered plan is needed. Want to attract more high paying, non-manufacturing jobs? Well, we need a community of skilled workers. That needs to be addressed through the schools and secondary education. Want high-skilled, well paid workers to live in Seguin? Well, we need to make the city even more livable and inviting to that demographic. Less crime, better roads, curbs and sidewalks, more recreational opportunities, etc. Plus a certain dose of cache, charm and gravitas. Simply put,,, Seguin can use more “cool factor”. To me, that means some growing pains will be experienced. It will take vision, planning, depth and strong leadership over a couple of decades to turn our caterpillar into a butterfly. It can be done but the community at large must want to reach for it!

    1. I couldn’t agree more, Travis. The Realtor community is a powerful group. I hope you all can be engaged in advocating for a comprehensive approach to support of our schools, our economic diversity and our quality of life.

  2. The original article and reply are so good it is hard to write any thing without being redundant. Seguin, because of its large manufacturing base is unusually at risk to robotization of the economy that is heading at us like a speeding bullet. I agree with the article by Tess and the first Reply. I am cautiously optomistic because I see that our community is aware of the issues it faces and is attempting to address them. There will need to be a multi pronged approach by the school system, local government and local industry. I see this happening. The schools are placing emphasis on well paying carreer/tech jobs as welll as college preparation. There are also partnerships with local industry and colleges like TLU. The City has begun to address local infrastructure that was neglected by prior generations and there is increasing community awareness. Because of our central location there will be growth. The challenge for Pecantown will be to have the type of growth that will make Segin the kind of place people want to work and live in and that will increase the quality of life for all its residents.

    1. Thank you for these insights, Robert. I am sure we can “knit together” the efforts of each of these stakeholders and rationalize our economic development plans for the future if we keep the conversation going.

  3. Hi Tess,

    Nice article! It seems you’ve hit some similar points to the answer I just gave to your question on the Robotiq blog.

    Your point about different parts of the society feeling the disparity of the effects of automation differently is very true. I think that’s why a lot of robotics commentators at the moment are talking about a Universal Basic Income, even though at first glance the two topics don’t seem very related. However, call me a cynic, but I don’t think that most of the countries of the world would even consider a Universal Basic Income.

    Even so, I’m not sure that the link between automation being a strong driving factor for the rise in income disparity is really made clear. You say that “This trend will intensify as automation increases.” but the change of earnings is affected by a huge number of different social and economic factors. Automation is only one of many. It’s a very popular, headline-grabbing factor but it’s difficult to say whether or not it’s a huge driving force behind the trends. It could be. But, I’m inclined to think that it’s much more complicated than that.

    I entirely agree with your 5 recommendations! I’m a big believer in taking control of one’s own learning as a way to continue to function in the world. Of course, this is easy for me to say – as someone privileged enough to have experienced good learning from the start. Then again, just because someone dropped out of high school doesn’t mean they haven’t continued learning. Lifelong learning need not, and should not, be limited to formal education.

    Cheers,
    Alex

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *